On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:10:11AM -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> I agree...but I simply won't let this egregious misinformation be
> proliferated without refute ;-)
Perhaps Austin you should make up a web page detailing everything that has
been discussed here in the past and simply point people to it whenever you
consider them to have confounded technical terms. It would save a lot of
collective groaning everytime the subject rears its ugly head and may save a
few people from hitting the unsubscribe button!
>
> > STOP! Not this again, please...
> >
> > (Anyone who is keen can consult the archives...
> >
> > ...where a search for "dynamic range" will turn up 570 messages)
> >
> > > Yeah, but the description of what dynamic range, well, is simply wrong.
> > >
> > > Austin
> > >
> > >
> > > > BRAVO!!!!
> > > >
> > > > That's what I call a very usefull clear and understandable
> > explanation. We
> > > > need some more of these instead of the sometimes boring
> > discussions going
> > > > around here on the forum....:-)
>
--
Tony Terlecki
ajt@mrps.demon.co.uk
Running Debian/GNU 3.0 Linux
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
