[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range

["Charlie" <charlieh@wt.net>]

Bob Frost wrote:
>
> Charlie,
>
> Nikon claims better 'Density Range' for the LS4000 not 'Dynamic Range'. I'm
> sure Austin would tell us which is correct!!! I've forgotten already.
>
> Bob Frost.


OK. Just substitute "shadow detail". I was only trying to say that
according to the test shots I've looked at, the LS 4000 gives better
shadow detail. Personally, I couldn't justify the additional cost of
the LS 4000, as I have no need for scans at 4000 ppi. So I plod along
with the Coolscan IV. But for really difficult slides, I do a little
better using Vuescan and multipass scans.
--
Charlie Hoffpauir
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~charlieh/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body