Alex Zabrovsky wrote:
>
> Thanks for suggestion, but first of all I don't use Vuescan (tried it a
> while ago, didn't like neither the result nor the interface).
> Besides of that, I doubt there might be really discernable difference in
> this manner between the IV ED and LS4000. Running both at 8 bit mode
> (regular scan, no multisampling) both should produce similar results (I
> don't think resolution differences can do something in regard of dynamic
> range).
> Am I wrong ?
>
> Regards,
> Alex Z
Alex,
I don't know if your supposition about the dynamic range of the IV vs
the LS 4000 is correct or not. Test shots I've seen seem to indicate
better shadow detail for the 4000, but I don't have one and have no
experience using one.* The LS 4000, as best I can recall, "claims"
better dynamic range..... but of course all claims of dynamic range
performance are suspect.
* Compare, for example, this shot:
with this one:
--
Charlie Hoffpauir
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
