ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] comparing raw positive and raw negative scans


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] comparing raw positive and raw negative scans
  • From: "Joe Pedit" <pedit@email.unc.edu>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:12:44 -0400
  • Organization: UNC-CH
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I recently scanned a black and white negative containing an image of a
MacBeth color card.  I scanned the film as a positive and negative with
a Sprintscan 4000 and saved the uncorrected raw scans in 12 bit mode.  I
then compared average pixel values for the different squares of the
color chart for each scan.  The results are at:
http://www.unc.edu/~pedit/chart.gif
The best fit line is:
negative pixel value = 256 - 1.25 * positive pixel value
Why is the slope -1.25 instead of -1?  Shouldn't the slope be -1 if the
scanner is truly outputting "raw" results?

Thanks,
Joe

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.