Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Macintosh Image Archiving/Indexing Software
Thanks--that explains it
On 7/16/02 3:28 AM, "David Townend" <d.townend@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> I'm using iView. On the speed test you conducted on iView if you didn't have
> "ignore built in thumbnails" ticked (Edit>Import Options>On Import>Ignore
> built in thumbnails - ticked) iView will indeed use thumbnails existing in
> the files you are importing, rather than build its own (which are far
> superior). But this takes more time.
> Regards, David
> -
>
>> From: "Brad Smith" <bms0345@pacbell.net>
>> Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:49:55 -0700
>> To: d.townend@ntlworld.com
>> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Macintosh Image Archiving/Indexing Software
>>
>> I'm GUESSING that the 4 and 6 second results for adding the 10 large images
>> somehow grabbed existing thumbnails while the approx 40 second ones "built"
>> their own. So I don't know that the test is meaningful. Opinions??
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
