ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Archiving and when to sharpen(was:Color spaces for differentpurposes)



I have occasionally gotten JPEGs that were larger than the original,
uncompressed TIFF file if the file contained a lot of detail and had been
heavily sharpened, and the JPEG compression was set at maximum quality /
minimum compression. So it can happen, but in my personal experience only
rarely.

- David

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of doogle@doogle.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 11:43 PM
[snip]
The only time I've seen a compressed file come out larger than a
non-compressed one
is when using .zip on a JPEG.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.