ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Archiving and when to sharpen (was:Color spaces for differentpurposes)



It's not that unusual, though I don't recall why, and LZW compression will
not reduce file size nearly as much as JPG

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: <doogle@doogle.com>
To: <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Archiving and when to sharpen (was:Color spaces
for differentpurposes)


[snipped]

The reason I ask is that I just compared a scanned photograph of
> 3591 X 5472 pixel size saved in several formats.  The results were:
>
> TIFF                            36,498 kb
> TIFF with lwz compression       36, 523 kb
> JPG @ Photoshop level 12        17,633 kb

Wow, are you sure? The LZW TIFF was *larger*?
That's unusual.





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.