Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Color spaces for different purposes



On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:33:05 -0500, you wrote:

>Probably the artifacts created in the compression process.  It would
>probably be better to convert to JPG first and then sharpen.


But when printing it's best to go direct from the TIFF isn't it?  This
is where I run into it.  When producing for the web, yes, I go to jpeg
and then sharpen.  Actually, I often resize the TIFF to the pixel size
I want, do the rest of my editing and then sharpen just before
converting to JPEG.  I get good results this way.    Come to think of
it, I see a lot more sharpening effect when the TIFF has been resized
than before - let alone the JPEG.  

 I also haven't experimented with the "for print" output setting in
Vuescan - any idea what this does differently?  


Ken

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.