Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon Coolscan 4000 ED

That's an interesting observation.  Although I haven't used the SS4000
personally (I have used the SS4000+), yours is the first report I am
aware of with a complaint about the shadow detail on the SS4000, in fact
until the newest generation of scanners (the SS4000+, the Canon FS4000
the Nikon 4000ED) it was considered by most to have the best shadow
response of all the prosumer scanners on the market.  Perhaps yours was


al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk wrote:

> Tom Scales wrote:
>>I had an SS4000 and it with an LS-400 (4000ED).  The Polaroid is a better
>>scanner.  Better shadow detail.  Crisper -- no depth of field problem.
> I'd certainly agree on the depth of field but I didn't find the SS4000 had 
>very good
> shadow detail (I'm talking slides here).  The shadows were blocked up, much 
>worse than my
> old Minolta Elite even though both are 12 bit scanners.
> Al Bond

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.