Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon Coolscan 4000 ED



That's an interesting observation.  Although I haven't used the SS4000
personally (I have used the SS4000+), yours is the first report I am
aware of with a complaint about the shadow detail on the SS4000, in fact
until the newest generation of scanners (the SS4000+, the Canon FS4000
the Nikon 4000ED) it was considered by most to have the best shadow
response of all the prosumer scanners on the market.  Perhaps yours was
defective.

Art

al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk wrote:

> Tom Scales wrote:
>
>
>>I had an SS4000 and it with an LS-400 (4000ED).  The Polaroid is a better
>>scanner.  Better shadow detail.  Crisper -- no depth of field problem.
>>
>
> I'd certainly agree on the depth of field but I didn't find the SS4000 had 
>very good
> shadow detail (I'm talking slides here).  The shadows were blocked up, much 
>worse than my
> old Minolta Elite even though both are 12 bit scanners.
>
>
> Al Bond
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.