ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Tri-X on Nikon 4000



David writes:

> For the sake of any newer readers, who
> haven't been following the various threads
> in this list, Tony Atkielski is referring
> only to his limited personal experience with
> the Nikon 8000ED model scanner.

No, Anthony is referring to his extensive experience with the Nikon LS-2000,
which scans Portra very nicely.  I haven't scanned Portra 400BW on the
8000ED yet.

In the future, please let Anthony describe what he does and does not have
experience with, instead of speculating.

> It has been proven conclusively that the Portra
> film series suffers acute problems with several
> "new generation hi-rez scanners".

What sorts of problems, and where can I see this proof?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.