ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: The"Pepper Grain" problem


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: The"Pepper Grain" problem
  • From: "Martin Greene" <camerabuggy@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:32:02 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <200204151607.16XfzG3253NZFlq0@merlin>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Roger

I read your follow-up.  This certainly broadens the problem.  Since I use a
Sprintcscan 4000 and therefore do not have the use of ICE, I guess I'll have
to continue to spend an hour or so with the rubber stamp on each image.
What a fate.

Martin


> Hi Martin,
> If you scroll down to the end of the Nick Rains article you
> will see my follow-up, including photomicrograph, in which I
> attribute the 'pepper grain' to microscopic bubbles in the
> scratch-resistant layer which protects the emulsion. I also have seen
> the 'pepper grain' effect on every brand of film I have examined, not
> just Fuji, and in both slides and negatives.
>
> Regards,
> Roger Smith

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.