ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: MF scanners



Tomek

What are the price comparisons where you bought your scanner
Nikon8000/PolariodSS120/Minolta Scan Multi?


rob


Tomek Zakrzewski wrote:

> Bernie Kubiak wrote:
> > I think camera shop staff are trained to say "I recommend Nikon."  I don't
> > have the MF version of the Polaroid scanner but a friend does (he bougth
> it
> > when he got frustrated waiting for the Nikon unit to ship) and he's been
> > very happy with it.
>
> Nikon and Polaroid. This list seem not to consider the Minolta MF scanner.
> I decided to buy this one. Nikon is too expensive, and can't use strips of 3
> 6x7 frames, also has problems with DOF and too low dmax for b&w silverbased
> films (I proved it myself). The Polaroid is an *excellent* scanner but also
> too expensive and doesn't have ICE, which is a huge drawback if, apart from
> your regular stuff, you also have some archival stuff to scan.
>
> Regards
>
> Tomasz Zakrzewski
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.