ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: SS4000


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: SS4000
  • From: "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@polaroid.com>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:28:47 -0500
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Somehow I think there may be a compliment in there :)
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Tris Schuler [mailto:tristanjohn@mindspring.com]
Sent:   Friday, January 04, 2002 12:39 AM
To:     hemingd@polaroid.com
Subject:        [filmscanners] Re: SS4000


>I own the 4000 ED and owned the SS4000.
>
>It was a mistake.  The Polaroid is a better scanner.  The only advantage of
>the Nikon is ICE.  Dust isn't as big a problem on the Polaroid.  The edge
>softness IS there.
>
>Keep the Polaroid.
>
>Tom

In a way I disagree. The Polaroid resolves lint strands down to one pixel
in width! (Not that anyone but me would be in there editing that stuff out.
<g>)

Tris


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.