ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: LS8000 Banding Question



It's probably the usual problem of someone  (or several people) quite
influential in the organisation either not understanding the full
implications of the issue or not wanting to admit they screwed up. Therefore
they are not prepared to find the resource (ultimately money) to fix it.
They will often pretend it doesn't exist. The argument usually goes "We sell
lots of units with few returns, so what's the problem".

Typical short term profit view.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Smith" <lsmith@lwsphoto.com>
To: "filmscanners halftone.co.uk" <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: LS8000 Banding Question


>
> >
> > I hate to say it this way, but that is just SO pathetic!  From what I
> > understand, fixing it would require a firmware modification to both
> > calibrate three lines instead of one, and then to use three calibration
> > lines instead of one.  Having written a LOT of embedded firmware, and
> > designed a few scanners, I just can't imagine what their problem is.  My
> > only guess is there is something else that prohibits them from fixing
> > it...what, I don't know...  Did they happen to mention WHY they won't
fix
> > it?
> >
>
> Austin,
>
> I was never able to get a straight answer from them.  Big surprise ;-0
> Seemed pretty lame to me too...
>
> Lawrence
>
> ------------------------------
> Lawrence W. Smith Photography
> http://www.lwsphoto.com
> lsmith@lwsphoto.com
> ------------------------------
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.