ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???



> --- Austin Franklin <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > or it is NOT a true 4k x 4k pixel back, but a 4k x 4k
> > sensor
> > back.
>
> Depends on how the advertiser defines a pixel ... ;)

Yeah, I've thought about that...and I don't know any definition of color
pixels that only includes one of the three colors...obviously, B&W is a
single value...but these cameras aren't monochrome...  24 bit color pixels
consist of one 8 bit value of each of the three colors... 36 bit of one 12
bit value of each of the three colors...and that's a LOT more data than you
get out of the sensor!

A 4k x 4k sensor, say at 8 bits/site (for sake of ease)...gives you
16,777,216 bytes.  A file that is 4k x 4k x 24 bits/pixel (8 bits for each
color) gives you 50,331,648 bytes.  Obviously, all that data isn't original
image data, it had to be "created" somehow...




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.