ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000



Thanks Bruce - yes, as soon as I started projecting Kchromes, I encountered 
this problem, so I went back to the shop to ask how I could get them sharp 
edge-to-edge on screen..  I ended up buying one of those curved field lenses (I 
think it's a Leitz?) to suit my Rollei projector, and it gives stunning images.

If you have only ever viewed your slides on a mediocre projector/lens, you are 
definitely missing an experience..  But of course you also quickly find out how 
critical camera steadiness and lens quality are, as per Rob's comments.
:-(  


> >These problems seem to only apply to quite 'bent' film, eg 
<<snip>>
> Perhaps it's worth noting that Kodak now provides "curved field" 
> projection lenses as standard for normal (cardboard, presumably) 
> mounted slides in their Carousel projectors, but their older "flat 
> field" design is recommended for glass mounted transparencies.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.