Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000



I am puzzled.  My Nikon LS-4000 delivers razor sharp images.  I see very
little if any of the blurriness you mention.  I have carefully checked shots
taken with a tripod and L series Canon lens on Supra 100 and  zoomed to
2-400% in Photoshop.  Very sharp.  Maybe I just got a good one.  I don't
think I'm ignorant enough not to know the difference.


Bob Kehl




----- Original Message -----
From: tom <ch_fs@yahoo.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000


> > Nikon LS 4000 are sharp in the middle of the  film area but un sharp out
> > against the sides and corner . The example are from  the right side of a
> > slide  film.
> I have to support Mikel. Recently I was able to scan photos with my FS4000
and
> the same negatives/slides were scanned with Nikon. The scans from Nikon
are
> very smoth (nearly no grain) but also all of them are just blured. If you
apply
> "despeckle" filter to Canon scan once or even twice you will get the same
image
> as from Nikon (very small noises but blured).
>
> Regards
>
> Tom
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> http://personals.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.