ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RAID and scratch



on 11/17/01 7:51 PM, Charles Knox wrote:

> In general, the RAID partition would be faster, but not by as much as you
> might think, since it would also be creating more seeks on the primary
> drive, thus slowing it down quite a bit.

Forgot to ask about where the system and application should go. Lets say I
have three disks, one of which is the RAID. I was thinking to use my
smallest drive for my OS and applications (including PS), the RAID
exclusively for images, and a third drive for a second system, misc. backup,
and a partition for scratch. Is this the best way to allocate system,
images, application, and scratch, across the three drives or should they be
grouped differently?

Todd




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.