ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI



Margins are cool.


----- Original Message -----
From: Austin Franklin <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI


>
> > Fast sync speeds being desirable, maximum sync in any particular
> > design is determined by that fastest speed where entire frame is
still
> > open at once.  Another one that doesn't require an engineering
degree
> > to understand:)
>
> In simple terms, yes...the concept IS simple...but there may be
other
> factors involved (such as the mechanical timing of the sync closure,
> latency, and possibly tolerance), which is what I am asking.  It may
be that
> the next speed up from synch is also fully open.  Shutter speeds can
be
> quite off from what they are labeled...so to allow margins, the next
speed
> down from one that is fully open may be the one they use for max
sync speed,
> possibly to assure reliability.
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.