Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600
From: Ken Durling <kdurling@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:55:09 -0800
In-reply-to: <001b01c16151$4c125680$0200000a@jorge>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <001b01c16151$4c125680$0200000a@jorge>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:42:30 -0300, you wrote:

>Kodak claims that a complete 36 roll of 35 mm
>can be scanned unatended.


Wow.  How much RAM would that take?  Or does just one scan at a time
live in memory?




Ken

References:
- filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600
  - From: "Jorge Talkowski" <talko@arnet.com.ar>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Acer 2720S and Windows XP - Miraphoto works?
Next by Date: re: filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600
Previous by thread: filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600
Next by thread: re: filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread