ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI




> As for me, I'm quite surprised at the image quality obtainable
> from, say, a 3.3 Mp camera if there is so much interpolation going on.

I agree...but what you are seeing, though it looks really good, isn't really
all in the original image.  These cameras do maintain edge detail very well,
but lack in texture detail from my experience.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.