ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.




> We
> use a 42 bit Microtek Scanmaker X12 USL scanner, ant
> it works well.  On our old, cheaper 24 bit Umax we could not do
> this.....On that one, we needed to scan at full resolution and
> then convert in Photoshop.

Exactly what I was saying.  There is no set rule which is better for "any"
scanner, it's something that needs to be tested.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.