ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X



Hey Tom!!!

Are you from the Olympus Mailing List? ;-) I think the same
as you, and I´ve decided to increase my OM gear and buy the
LS-4000. I think tomorrow or in a few days I´ll have it.
I think that is a real pity to jump to digital market and
waste money with new lenses. Next year (new 5.5 mpixel
Olympus camera) and sure it won´t have OTF light metring, 
multispot metering, etc... 

Nice to see you. 

Dave

Tom Scales wrote:
> 
> And a fine lens it is, as are my Olympus 16/3.5 and 18/3.5 and the other
> couple dozen Zuikos I own
> 
> Now if I could just find that digital OM back.
> 
> Tom
> 
> From: "bob geoghegan"
> 
> > Olympus has made a 21/2 since the '80s.  Just don't ask me what digital
> > body will take it.
> >
> > Agreed on the general problem of digital & short lenses.  Now where's that
> > 10-20 megapixel 36x24 CCD that has 90+ deg. angle of acceptance, is housed
> > in a 35mm spool, can be loaded into most-any 35mm camera, has great
> storage
> > & battery life and costs less than $1,000???  Oops, dreaming again....
> > BobG

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Unofficial Olympus web page
http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/index.html
Unofficial Olympus Gallery
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/irissari/irissari.html
------------------------------------------------------------




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.