ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X



A lens are sharper in the middle, I suggest that you go to        http://www 
Photodo.com
MTF tests of lenses by Lars Kjellberg or read Norman Koren page              
            http://www.normankoren.com/
Mikael Risedal

>From: "Anthony Atkielski" <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X
>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:30:30 +0200
>
>Steve writes:
>
> > But you do have the advantage that the centre is
> > invariably sharper, often much sharper, than the edge.
>
>If that is such an advantage, why hasn't anyone designed lenses for 24x36 
>that
>cover a much larger area than the film frame?  The same logic would apply.
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.