ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X




----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Meier" <robert_meier_photo@yahoo.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X
>
>
> > Or another way to look at it is that you just crop the inner part of a
> > 35mm frame. In other words, you are using just parts of what your 35mm
> > lens covers. That means you have lots of glass (the area increases with
> > the square of the radius) that you waste.
>
> But you do have the advantage that the centre is invariably sharper, often
> much sharper, than the edge.
>
> Steve
>
>
I forgot any nasty lens distortion is usually concentrated at the edges.

Steve




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.