Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?



Well, I do agree multipass scanning has many problems and using it to
overcome the limitations of a scanner is clearly a bad idea.  Get a better
scanner <g>.

Tom

From: "Hemingway, David J"
> Tom,
> The review in this Octobers MacWorld showed the same result as the review
a
> year and a half ago. The Polaroid scanner gets at least as good shadow
> detail in a single pass as the competitors model with a 16X multiscan.
Using
> multiscanning to get increased shadow detail can also cause other negative
> effects to the image, primarily softness. We have seen this in our work to
> implement multi-scanning for Polaroid scanners and it is not easy to
> overcome.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.