ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?



Tom,
The review in this Octobers MacWorld showed the same result as the review a
year and a half ago. The Polaroid scanner gets at least as good shadow
detail in a single pass as the competitors model with a 16X multiscan. Using
multiscanning to get increased shadow detail can also cause other negative
effects to the image, primarily softness. We have seen this in our work to
implement multi-scanning for Polaroid scanners and it is not easy to
overcome.


 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.