Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
> For example, I have 2700-dpi scans of my
> photos that I prepare myself. If that's not good enough for
> someone who wants
> to license a photo, he's going to pay at least an order of
> magnitude more for a
> drum scan,
But that contradicts your previous claim...that 2700 spi is all that is
needed...there is no benefit from scanning at more than 2700... How can
that be?
|
