ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Scan Dual II Bad Elements - was Supra 400 shadows



How do the bad elements in the CCD evidence themselves?

Norm Unsworth, Owner
CS Golf (formerly Clark Systems Custom Golf)
Outstanding Quality and Value in Custom Golf Equipment
609 641 5712
Please send email to me at: csgolf@home.com 
Visit our Web Site at http://members.home.net/csgolf

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:48 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows


I recently had my Minolta Dual II replaced by Minolta, after only owning
it a week.  The second one has lower "noise" in the shadow areas than
the first... 

More important, however, is my first one had many "bad" elements in the
CCD.  I was unable to determine if this is a matter of physically bad
CCD elements or dirt in the unit, or defective filters over the CCD, or
bad calibration or what.  The first unit had between 3 and 5 bad sensors
per color...

Art






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.