ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: 35mm filmscanner choice



>> If a manufacturer was to list an lpi speck using the same method they
>> list dpi specks, they would simply be i/2 the dpi or ppi number.
>
>"half" was what I was expecting (for the ideal case, as it were), though I
>was wondering whether it is trickier than that, because resolution in
>optical terms is about distinguishing a pair (or pairs) of black lines, as
>far as I can tell.  How well one has to distinguish these lines is just one
>question I could ask, but won't.

I believe there are 3 common standards for MTF:
1.  the peak-to-peak (dark to light) change drops to 0.5 (the most stringent)
2.  the peak-to-peak change drops to 0.1 of maximum (more liberal)
3.  can you see the line? (the most liberal).

Mike Duncan





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.