ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



This is off topic, but several of Intel's recent chipsets have had memory
addressability limitations. The 810 and it's variants, for instance cannot
even address 1 gig (I forget the threshold, either 512 or 768).


Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>



> >  There are also large numbers of motherboards around which don't
> > cache the memory above 512Mb (or an even lower limit).  With those it
may
> > degrade overall performance to add more than 512 Mb.
> >
>
> I can't think of any motherboards for Pentium II/III/IV,Celerons,Athlons
or
> Durons for which this will apply as they all have onboard 2nd level cache
> with the exception of the early celerons (266 & 300 [plain 300]). The 266
&
> 300 celerons were pathetic due to a complete lack of 2nd level cache.
>
> The only limit that I can remember is 64MB for Intel TX chipset which was
> for Pentium I.
>
> Steve


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.