Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: artificial light



Thomaz:

Tungsten light is always "warmer" by several Kelvins than natural light, as 
you know. If you can't buy film rated for tungsten light (and I'm not sure 
you can), you can use a light blue filter, which unfortunately reduces the 
incident light you're working with (I don't know the filter 
numbers--photographers and photo shops will be better help here).

Otherwise, if you can set the color curves in your scan-driver, that may be 
your best way of proceding (I'm taking it that your scanner is seeing yellow 
in the prints that you're not seeing when you look at them ? ).

Reducing the yellow intensity (or the yellow saturation, as it sounds like 
might be the problem) in Photoshop is another option.

Best regards--LRA


>From: "Tomasz Zakrzewski" <tomzakrz@ka.onet.pl>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: filmscanners: artificial light
>Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 02:28:03 +0200
>
>How filmscanners get away with negatives exposed in tungsten halogen light?
>I do a lot of stage photography and during the printing process I get quite
>neutral prints but is this the case with filmscanners? Having made recently
>contact sheets from my negs on ,y new flatbed I noticed that a frame 
>exposed
>in tungsten lighting is totally lemon yellow on the scan. Is it 
>coorrectable
>as in standard photographic process?
>
>Regards
>Tomasz Zakrzewski
>
>online portfolio
>www.zakrzewski.art.pl
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.