Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan gripes

I concur completely. I too have an LS-30 which would have been an
unattractive doorstop without VueScan. VueScans support of infrared
cleaning is also a life saver. Despite the flashy new Nikon Scan v3.1
supporting the LS-30 and having some seemingly good features (including
a histograms and jaggy free scans) VueScan still produces better scans.

Now as for that interface...     ;-)

Bruce Roberts.

PS. I have just recently returned to this list after a long break. Does
anybody know if Ed Hamrick still partakes? If not does anybody have his
email address at hand?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Friday, 20 July 2001 11:28 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan gripes

Rafe wrote:
>Ayup.  I still wonder why Vuescan is so revered by so many.
>Earlier versions didn't even have a preview window.

Because it gets me results from my scanner I simply can't get with the
driver.  Sure, the interface could be improved, but *any* interface that
gets me better results than Nikonscan and gives me more value for money
from my scanner purchase is very worthwhile.  I would have thrown the
out the window long ago if it wasn't for Vuescan.  No interface other
vuescan gives me 10 bits per channel, and until recently no other
eliminated the jaggies.


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.