Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question



No, I think I am using way to much - basing it on my screen preview. I am
running some tests this weekend looking at printouts at various levels.

/fn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 4:28 PM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question
>
>
> "Frank Nichols" <frank@theNichols.net> wrote:
> > something I CAN do to it - they are coming out almost perfect. The
> scariest
> > part so far has been trying to figure out the USM to use. These
> are Provia
> > 100F slides scanned at 2700 DPI on my Scanwit and they look a
> bit "soft".
> > However, where I normally start getting nervous if I use over
> 150% at 1.2
> > radius with threshold of 4 on negatives (Kodak Super 100) here I am up
> into
> > 250% or more before I see the effect I want - and I seem to have to be
> more
> > careful to avoid pixelization at those levels.
>
> Gad, unsharp mask over 100%?  I've been using a radius of 2.0 and
> only 60%.
> Is there something I'm seriously missing about USM?
>
> Rob
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.