ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000



I am very picky - I checked several times at 1200% magnification and I saw
no vertical or horizontal offsets visible at the pixel level. The reason I
said "appears" is that I assume there is some slack or play in the transport
mechanism and perfect can not be achivied.

The reason I was skeptical was I tried using multipass scanning on a flatbed
(HP5370) and saw the offset effect. Since the offset was repeatable I
suggested to ED H (Vuescan) that he include an option to allow the user to
input an offset value for subsequent passes.

/fn

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Herm
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:34 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


appears is the key word, I do astrophotography and even the slightest miss
alignment will show double stars in the final product. It really depends on
how
picky you are.

"Frank Nichols" <frank@theNichols.net>  wrote:

>I use a Scanwit 2720 and Vuescan with Multipass scanning and the alignment
>appears to be perfect.
>
>/fn

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.