Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?

I use Frontier prints for my commercial clients who need quantity
prints.  The requirement is to prepare an output size TIFF file at 300
dpi, and tagged sRGB.  My studio system is calibrated using
ColorVision PhotoCal and Profiler Pro, and the Frontier prints are
practically identical to my 1160 dye on glossy prints from the same
files.  It's great having Photoshop and color management available for
high quality "C" print processes, and Frontier print costs are
reasonable.  (it's the X-rite DTP-41 that's expensive:)


----- Original Message -----
From: Tomasz Zakrzewski <tomzakrz@ka.onet.pl>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?

> Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures.
> Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier?
> Great quality, 300dpi, up to 22x13,7", archival quality (especially
on Fuji
> Crystal Archive Paper) and last but not last photographic paper.
> I will read your answers with great interest.
> Tomasz Zakrzewski


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.