ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?



"'Popular Photography' is to Photography as 'The Sound of Music' is to
Music."

ted orland

Robert Wright

> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:25 +0200
> From: "Oostrom, Jerry" <Jerry.Oostrom@Alcatel.nl>
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
>
> I just read in Popular Photography about a test on 7 filmscanners.
The Nikon
> LS-4000ED I believe was also mentioned there as having few shadow
detail.
> The SS120 had great shadow detail in that test.
>
> Since nobody else on this list mentioned this test (an american
magazine,
> sent to Holland--> plenty of time for americans to read it) I assume
its not
> such a popular magazine among filmscanner people?




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.