Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?



Title: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?

Paul,

I would suggest you ignore ALL the manufacturers specifications and base you decision on looking at actual scans done by yourself or a reputable independent source.

I probably could not be termed independent but I hopefully reputable. The only scanner I have seen that may have marginally better shadow detail than the SS120 is the Imacon but only marginally. Several others have said the same. In the 4000 DPI category I have not seen anything better than the SS4000 particularly when you consider it achieves it’s  density in a single pass which I also think preserves sharpness.

David Hemingway

Polaroid Corporation.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson, Paul [mailto:PWilson@gomez.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:23 AM
To: 'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?

 

So, has anyone done any comparisons between the Polaroid SS120 and the Nikon LS8000 as far as shadow detail goes?  What about an LS4000 vs. a SS4000?

TIA

Paul Wilson



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.