Filmscanners mailing list archive (firstname.lastname@example.org)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
Because the inkjet is at home or at the office and we have to go out to the
lab. And because we may not like the first print and can tweak it to print
again (and again and again?). And because our color settings within the
image, the "numbers", may not work well in the minilab.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Zakrzewski" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
| Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures.
| Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier?
| Great quality, 300dpi, up to 22x13,7", archival quality (especially on
| Crystal Archive Paper) and last but not last photographic paper.
| I will read your answers with great interest.
| Tomasz Zakrzewski