Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
At 10:14 PM 6/28/01 +0200, Tomasz wrote:
>Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures.
>Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier?
>Great quality, 300dpi, up to 22x13,7", archival quality (especially on Fuji
>Crystal Archive Paper) and last but not last photographic paper.
>
>I will read your answers with great interest.
Speaking for myself... because I'm a control freak.
I like having complete control of the print. If it's
not right, I can do it again. The cost is low enough
to allow that.
I have used Lightjet (Cymbolics CS-5000) to make some
very large prints on occasion, or when a client
specifically requests archival output.
I've been meaning to give one of the Fuji Pictography
machines a try, but never got around to it.
rafe b.
|
