Cliff Ober wrote:
> Please forgive my comment; you're right, it was out of line, and I'm sorry
> to have offended.
> Cliff Ober
I've got an even better idea, let's take this whole LED business, which
was once interesting and is now degenerating into "Did not" "Did too"
silliness, offline. I'm as guilty as anyone else, and I promise that
this is my last post on this topic...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:17 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners
> > Some of your recent statements of technical "fact" seem to be
> > casting a bit
> > of a shadow on your own credentials as an engineer;
> That comment is really out of line. If you want to question my credentials,
> please do so privately. There is only ONE statement I made that is in
> question, that I am aware of, and that is the 1000 hours life of an LED.
> Other than that, what other statements of technical "fact" are you referring
> > once again here are
> > sites with valid data:
> And once again, here is a scan of the information I sourced that also
> contains valid data: