Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED



I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the
SprintScan 4000. It's price has gone down and it's bundled with SilverFast.
Also,overall, I've heard good things about Polaroid's customer service.
Finally, I'm not sure that NOT having an onboard dust and scratch removal
option like FARE or ICE would make a significant difference, since,
according to what I've read, the SprintScan scans/read less dust, scratches,
etc. than the Nikon systems.

Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "jm1209" <jm1209@jbic.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED


> i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it
> seems that i always wait for the next improved version  of many computer
> products and they wind up not being all that much better.
> the nikon has a better advertised dynamic range but less resolution.
> possibly this may be a better combination anyway.
> i am a new to this film scanner business and hope more people respond
> with their opinions.
> thanks
> jim
>
> Arthur Entlich wrote:
> >
> > AR Studio wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower.
> > >
> > > Does that help?
> > >
> > > Helen + Andrew
> >
> > Well, That's disappointing.  I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-)
> >
> > Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then.
> >
> > Art
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.