i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it
seems that i always wait for the next improved version of many computer
products and they wind up not being all that much better.
the nikon has a better advertised dynamic range but less resolution.
possibly this may be a better combination anyway.
i am a new to this film scanner business and hope more people respond
with their opinions.
Arthur Entlich wrote:
> AR Studio wrote:
> > Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower.
> > Does that help?
> > Helen + Andrew
> Well, That's disappointing. I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-)
> Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then.