Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding



Vai jus esat latvietis?

Karlis Schulmeisters
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding


> And, of course, the color gamut of film is greater than that of print.
> 
> Maris
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:42 PM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
> 
> 
> | >There is no doubt in my mind that scanning the negative is far better 
> | >than scanning the print.
> | 
> | My list of some reasons to scan from negative rather than print,
> | accumulated over three years of neg scan experience (and with a
> | lot of jump-start knowledge from others on the filmscanners list):
> 
> [snipped]
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.