Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding



And, of course, the color gamut of film is greater than that of print.

Maris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding


| >There is no doubt in my mind that scanning the negative is far better 
| >than scanning the print.
| 
| My list of some reasons to scan from negative rather than print,
| accumulated over three years of neg scan experience (and with a
| lot of jump-start knowledge from others on the filmscanners list):

[snipped]




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.