Filmscanners mailing list archive (firstname.lastname@example.org)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: What causes this ... projection
Whoops - sorry that was meant to be off-list has Laurie and I have already
bored you all tears with this one.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Greenbank" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What causes this ... projection
> Hi Laurie
> Part 2 here - part 3 may take some time as I'm quite busy and it's also
> area where we have the least common ground.
> > >I thought I had covered this with some sort of statement like "even
> > >viewed quite close-up", but I must have rephrased this and removed it
> > before
> > >I posted the message.
> > You did in your original message; but everything is relative. Some
> > and scenes display the grain more prominently than others as you have
> > and are obvious even at further distances; while others display grain
> > prominently even at quite close distances. However, the grain is none
> > less still there in all cases. You recent test seems to bear not only
> > point out; but the tests from what I can tell given the comparative
> > information you provided are inconclusive on my point that the screen
> > texture masks the grain structure more so than a smooth surface under
> > same conditions would for the same original.
> I said this in the original reply "I hadn't considered this and nor did I
> fetch my screen when I tried the
> slides tonight. But I can see that how this would work."
> I didn't try the screen test as I would probably of woken my son
> it from his bedroom. I felt that the test onto the paper would also show
> more clearly what the scanner sees.
> Once I had seen the grain on the Velvia slide (I had seen it on the
> Fujichrome 400 years ago) I didn't see a lot of point in trying with the
> But my feeling is: a textured surface helps mask the grain as the minor
> spots will have lighter spots reflected from the pits to mask the effect.
> The grain being darker will reflect less so the converse effect will be
> pronounced. This will lead to a reduction in randomly distributed darker
> Could be complete bullsh*t, but it seems fairly logical to me and until I
> get the screen out and find out otherwise I am pretty confident that you
> right about the screen.