ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40



OK.  So which other scanners offer these feature currently, and which 
are being upgraded to offer them?  Is Nikon going to offer these added 
features for the LS-2000?

Art

Jack Phipps wrote:


> All this to say, if I were choosing between a scanner with Digital ROC 
> and Digital GEM or a scanner without it, I would choose the one with. 
> And if I had any faded negatives (boy do  I) it would make the decision 
> even easier.
> 
>  
> 
> Seeing is believing.
> 
>  
> 
> Jack Phipps
> 
> Applied Science Fiction
> 





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.