ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII



Ed writes ...


> In a message dated 4/27/2001 7:43:30 PM EST, hersch@silcom.com
writes:
>
> > I found by
> >  accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700 ppi
scans on
> >  my LS-30 (where that should have been more than enough) and
64-bit, 2700
> >  ppi settings.
>
> I looked at the code, and I think I can see the problem.  I've added
> this to my list of things to fix.  Thanks for finding this.

    Not wanting to reply with an obvious observation, I would have
thought picking the 64bit option simply enabled scanning the IR, and
there for Hersch's improved dust removal.  Can you elaborate on what
you found?  Is this a problem with the LS-30 only?

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.