ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit





Tony Sleep wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:11:19 -0400 (EDT)  Lynn Allen (lalle@email.com) 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> I'm shocked at the 6 min, 9 sec scan time with ICE at high quality
>> 
> 
> It's a long time. But I have frequently spent 30+mins manually doing what 
> ICE does.
> 


As Jack mentioned, in case some people missed it, this is the cumulative 
time of 4 scans, not just one, so take 1/4th.  That is not worse than 
the Minolta Dimage Scan II does without ICE, and similar to my HP S-20 
does, also without any ICE.

Spotting can certainly take a long time, but I find I often do other 
corrections during that time as well that ICE can't possibly be AI 
enough to know, even if they are "Applied Science Fiction".

Art


Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.