Filmscanners mailing list archive (firstname.lastname@example.org)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit
Tony Sleep wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:11:19 -0400 (EDT) Lynn Allen (email@example.com)
>>> I'm shocked at the 6 min, 9 sec scan time with ICE at high quality
> It's a long time. But I have frequently spent 30+mins manually doing what
> ICE does.
As Jack mentioned, in case some people missed it, this is the cumulative
time of 4 scans, not just one, so take 1/4th. That is not worse than
the Minolta Dimage Scan II does without ICE, and similar to my HP S-20
does, also without any ICE.
Spotting can certainly take a long time, but I find I often do other
corrections during that time as well that ICE can't possibly be AI
enough to know, even if they are "Applied Science Fiction".