On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:33:06 -0400 Todd Radel (thr@schwag.org) wrote:
> I
> do not have another ICE scanner to compare it with, so I cannot evaluate
> Tony's comment that the Acer does an inferior job. ICE at a reasonable price
> was the main reason I bought this model.
Sorry, I have no direct (test) evidence about this, and it appears a
prejudicial comment. Whether qualitatively inferior to other implementations
of ICE (as some have said), I don't know, but the extra pass for IR is slower.
Regards
Tony Sleep
- Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info &
comparisons
